HeroQuest 25th anniversary crowdfunding!

[JasonMCM]

HQ is most likely never going to be made agian, if there was even a remote thought of it this site would have been C&Ded a very long time ago.

Like I said earlier the best we are going to do is WQ IF greed workshop thinks it would make them any money.


-JasonMCM

[Idomeneas]

Your is pure supposition. You say they wanted to take advantage of a decades-old board-game, I say the name was a combination of the names of their last two games. I say I'm right, and you're chaffed.

Actually marketing wise mine is the safest conclusion. HQ might be old, but it has a cult status among wargamers, dungeoncrawlers or pure retrofans. Everybody who was exposed to it remembers it.
I know that they claim that they had thought the name first, but its as credible as me saying that I thought to name a soft drink ''coca cola'' but they got the TM right out of my hands.

Again the problem is not that GZ are IP thieves. The problem is that they are clumsy IP thieves that got themselves caught and that means that their version of HQ will be extremely short lived. As fans we simply dont need that.

[Idomeneas]

HQ is most likely never going to be made agian, if there was even a remote thought of it this site would have been C&Ded a very long time ago.

Like I said earlier the best we are going to do is WQ IF greed workshop thinks it would make them any money.


-JasonMCM

To tell you the truth I dont know if I really want it to be made again. And what I mean is that Im afraid that it will not have the same production quality as the original one. I would certainly hate to see it becoming something like ''Descent'' with those ugly, smalish, soft plastic cheep minis.

[chaoticprime]

Your is pure supposition. You say they wanted to take advantage of a decades-old board-game, I say the name was a combination of the names of their last two games. I say I'm right, and you're chaffed.

Actually marketing wise mine is the safest conclusion. HQ might be old, but it has a cult status among wargamers, dungeoncrawlers or pure retrofans. Everybody who was exposed to it remembers it.
I know that they claim that they had thought the name first, but its as credible as me saying that I thought to name a soft drink ''coca cola'' but they got the TM right out of my hands.

Again the problem is not that GZ are IP thieves. The problem is that they are clumsy IP thieves that got themselves caught and that means that their version of HQ will be extremely short lived. As fans we simply dont need that.

No it isn't. You have no proof of that--again, only supposition. What I said still makes the most sense, because it does. Its self-evident. Its that good at being evidence of my claim.

Go get a job as something different. You're clearly not cut out for debate.

[Idomeneas]

Your is pure supposition. You say they wanted to take advantage of a decades-old board-game, I say the name was a combination of the names of their last two games. I say I'm right, and you're chaffed.

Actually marketing wise mine is the safest conclusion. HQ might be old, but it has a cult status among wargamers, dungeoncrawlers or pure retrofans. Everybody who was exposed to it remembers it.
I know that they claim that they had thought the name first, but its as credible as me saying that I thought to name a soft drink ''coca cola'' but they got the TM right out of my hands.

Again the problem is not that GZ are IP thieves. The problem is that they are clumsy IP thieves that got themselves caught and that means that their version of HQ will be extremely short lived. As fans we simply dont need that.

No it isn't. You have no proof of that--again, only supposition. What I said still makes the most sense, because it does. Its self-evident. Its that good at being evidence of my claim.

Go get a job as something different. You're clearly not cut out for debate.

While your job is to be ''debater''
Actually you have no proof that you know what you are saying. The name derives out of their last games names. Seriously? And then why didnt they use something like ''Questing Hero'' or '' A hero's Quest'' or ''Quest for Hero''? How come it HAD to be HEROQUEST not even Hero-Quest?
On the other hand what Im saying is self evident cause thats one of the ways market works. Offcourse you are free to believe Moon Design PR bullshit, next thing is that they will claim their game older than Dungeons and Dragons, oh wait...

[chaoticprime]

MD didn't steal anyone's IP. That's legally recognized fact.

[Idomeneas]

That's just not something you can prove, Watson.

But my conclusion is safer than swallowing Moon Design PR bullshit* which you cant also prove, Buffy


* (they thought the name first but MB was faster to aquire its TM... yeah right)

[TMU]

Dude, you called him sherlock, and he responded. So don't keep calling him names, as a little kid! Keep it nice, or shut up, both of you

[Idomeneas]

Dude, you called him sherlock, and he responded. So don't keep calling him names, as a little kid! Keep it nice, or shut up, both of you

Dude he was arrogant and insulting. He shouldnt expect flowers. Wish you were here to act as sheriff when he posed as the wise guy of the forum.

[chaoticprime]

Has MD harmed you in some way? You can tell me, I'm a detective.