Daria wrote:That's something to think about, but how would he be any more or less powerful than the Spellsinger (an elf with two schools of magic)?
Templar wrote:Daria wrote:Battlemage may equip weapons and armour otherwise unusable by the Wizard. The Battlemage may only use two schools of elemental magic.
I think this makes the battlemage too strong. Not only can he get as well protected as the other, but he can also use the juicy weapons to get a good close combat offense ability. Taking away just one school of magic seems too little a downside to me...
My first thought was to allow him only one school, but that would make him very much like the elf. I would say, maybe only allow him to use weapons, but not armour, and two schools? Or perhaps, let him use both waepons and armour, but he only gets one spell each from the three schools he chooses? This would mean less spells, but most likely very powerful ones...sounds like a battlemge to me
Just my opinion though...
Yeah, just remembered that in the American version you don't get the protective cloak and the bracers...
that would indeed make them very similar, although the spellsinger has the edge with more life points. At first he is even better, with a starting attack value of 2, but in the long run they even out.
However, if you play with bracers and cloak, i think the Battlemage is clearly better, since he can get access to the
wizard only items in addition to all the others. A 2 dice "advantage" in defense is a pretty big deal...
But honestly, I can only make sketchy arguments at best...I should make a more thorough analysis, with different hero/monster match-ups, but really, who has the time
I just commented on intuition
