Anderas wrote:Neutralizing is indeed a thing I had to learn the hard way in my company.
I am writing singular "they" and such things all the time when "composing" emails there. The frenchies often don't understand, the britains on the other hand insist on it.
I guess your english is better than mine, so if you say that "he" for "Beastman" is wrong in the year 2018, I follow your advice.
Thanks for those remarks, I'll take them now that I am already having it open...
In my own opinion, "he" for "Beastman" is not wrong as long as its a male Beastman. I can't remember seeing female Beastman minis, certainly not from GW, but once you find and use them, "he" becomes weird. Is Beastman culturally sophisticated enough to use that "they"? I don't know...
The problem lies in the word "Beastman" itself, but only for some left-leaning people (on a sidenote, can I say "people", or is that not inclusive enough?).
I guess I'm trying to say, Priorities...
But myself, I go with "they" and otherwise my guts in my texts. That's what compromise feminism gets from me cause it
feels right and doesn't sound like you invented a pronoun for something that doesn't need exclusive pronoun representation of its own, if you catch my drift.